Experience and trust
Author, about, and evidence signals — the stuff raters look for and thin AI pages skip.
Home / Tools / SEO Quality Rater
On-page quality modeled on rater-style guidelines: E-E-A-T, depth, structure, and technical signals — so you know if a page deserves to be retrieved.
What it covers, how you run it, and who it is for — then the long-form detail.
Author, about, and evidence signals — the stuff raters look for and thin AI pages skip.
Headings, coverage of the query, and whether the page actually answers it.
Titles, canonicals, and markup that help attribution — not a kitchen-sink Lighthouse clone.
Money pages first. Blog archives can wait.
Each factor is visible so you know whether to write more or fix the template.
Hand off to content, meta, or linking tools from the same report.
Do not ship a page that would fail a rater pass.
Find the dated pages that still rank but no longer deserve a citation.
A simple scorecard that is not 200 Lighthouse audits.
The rater is modeled on how quality evaluators think about pages: experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trust, depth, structure, and a tight technical set (title, canonical, markup) — not a 200-check Lighthouse clone.
Each bar is visible so you know whether to write more, add an author, or fix the template. A high keyword density with no evidence still fails.
Low trust and E-E-A-T usually means missing about/author/evidence, not “add more H2s.” Low depth means the query is not actually answered. Low technical is often a CMS default title or a missing Organization schema.
This does not replace the site-wide scanner. It is the page-level companion: one URL, one honest scorecard.
Hand off to the content generator for depth, the meta generator for titles, readability for fog, or the scanner for site-wide files. The rater is the diagnosis, not the entire hospital.
Free 30-second scan. See where you stand — then use SEO Quality Rater as part of scan, fix, and prove. No signup.
Free scan